Talk:Karl-Gottfried Nordmann/GA1

GA Review[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Auntieruth55 (talk · contribs) 19:31, 14 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Good Article review progress box

Criteria: 1a. prose () 1b. MoS () 2a. ref layout () 2b. cites WP:RS () 2c. no WP:OR () 2d. no WP:CV ()

3a. broadness () 3b. focus () 4. neutral () 5. stable () 6a. free or tagged images () 6b. pics relevant ()

Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked are unassessed

I've read the article. Very good. Up to your usual standard. I hope it's okay that I made some minor tweaks--mostly grammatical. Feel free to revert if it changed the meaning. What does the No.4 of notes mean? Also, we need someone who is familiar with the kinds of planes to review all those links and such. I could easily make a mistake there. auntieruth (talk) 19:31, 14 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your copy editing, also up to your usual standards :-) I update the comment, sorry it was left as work in progress MisterBee1966 (talk) 11:13, 15 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I'm read to pass it once someone looks at it who knows the planes. Could you round up one of the reviewers to do that? auntieruth (talk) 15:05, 15 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

All the aircraft links are good, Ruth. Cheers, Peacemaker67 (crack... thump) 07:55, 16 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewer - what information is available about this Nazi Germany biography and the individual's involvement in the genocide for which Nazi Germany is most notable? The article mentions nothing about Nazi Party membership, yet senior ranks in the Luftwaffe were not notably opposed to the Nazi regime and its policies? In ictu oculi (talk) 00:21, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]