This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Serbia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Serbia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SerbiaWikipedia:WikiProject SerbiaTemplate:WikiProject SerbiaSerbia articles
This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles
This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Karl von Krempler is within the scope of WikiProject Yugoslavia, a collaborative effort to improve the Wikipedia coverage of articles related to Yugoslavia and its nations. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.YugoslaviaWikipedia:WikiProject YugoslaviaTemplate:WikiProject YugoslaviaYugoslavia articles
With this edits (diff, diff) Peacemaker67 violated WP:BRD and edit warred to impose his point of view. Per Wikipedia:Edit warring"Edit warring is unconstructive and creates animosity between editors, making it harder to reach a consensus. "
@Peacemaker67, will you please be so kind to revert youreslf and try to resolve the disagreement through discussion?--Antidiskriminator (talk) 09:36, 3 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
No. Clearly the only English source calls this unit by that name. No-one is suggesting there is another English source at this point. So, the title should follow WP:ENGLISH. What could possibly be your argument against that? Peacemaker67 (send... over) 09:54, 3 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Its BRD, not BRRD. You should have discussed before edit warring, so please revert yourself. I presented my position at talkpage of article in question.--Antidiskriminator (talk) 10:01, 3 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
In this case, you have NO source in English at this title, which of course, is actually entirely in German. So your position is unreasonable and also unfathomable. BRD is for when there is a reasonable discussion to be had. There is no reasonable issue here other than WP:OWN, as the only English source for this Munoz. Unless you have another one? Feel free to bring it forward if you have one. I would be happy to reconsider my position in the face of an ENGLISH source for "SS Polizei-Selbstschutz-Regiment Sandschak". Peacemaker67 (send... over) 10:45, 3 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
