Talk:Katie and Emily/GA1
Appearance
GA Review
[edit]Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewing right now... // Gbern3 (talk) 18:36, 17 September 2009 (UTC)
- Promoting: Meets all GA criteria as listed here.
- It is reasonably well written.
- a (prose and grammar):
b (MoS):
- a (prose and grammar):
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (references):
b (citations to reliable sources):
c (OR):
- a (references):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects):
b (focused):
- a (major aspects):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars etc.:
- No edit wars etc.:
- It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):
b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail: Pass
- Pass/Fail: Pass
Congratulations. I was going to place this article on hold for GA promotion b/c I wasn't sure if the plot section needed references/citations. After checking four other GA-rated TV episode articles (none of which had refs in the plot section), I decided this promotion was justly deserved. I saw this article has been listed since July. You've been very patient. // Gbern3 (talk) 19:01, 17 September 2009 (UTC)
- Thanks for the review. —97198 (talk) 06:29, 18 September 2009 (UTC)