Talk:Kawasaki ER-5
Appearance
![]() | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
|
All personal opinion! Do you have any sources to back up your claims of “unexceptional handling” for example?
- I've removed all the details that appeared to be opinion or dubious without being sourced. Of course, the whole article should be sourced, but I've left what appears plausible for now. --Harris 19:57, 30 August 2007 (UTC)
- And there goes the "original research" claim about engine life too. Rogerborg (talk) 22:50, 21 October 2009 (UTC)
Cheers for that nobhead, that took me ages to write out! - Source my arse. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.111.179.43 (talk) 21:19, 30 September 2007 (UTC)