Talk:Kellett XR-8

This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

This article is supported by the rotorcraft project.

Military history: Aviation / North America / United States / World War II C‑class

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

C

This article has been rated as C-class on the project's quality scale.

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Military aviation task force
	North American military history task force
	United States military history task force
	World War II task force

Duplicate Article?

I've noticed that there is a second page with "XR-8" in the title: XR-8 Syncopter. As far as I can tell, these are the same vehicles, except the Syncopter page is only a stub. They probably need to be merged/redirected. --UnneededAplomb (talk) 20:22, 17 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, and Done! Nothing worth merging, although the name could be mentioned, with a good source. - BilCat (talk) 21:05, 17 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]