Talk:Ken W. Clawson

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the politics and government work group (assessed as Low-importance).

United States: District of Columbia Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject District of Columbia (assessed as Low-importance).

Untitled[edit]

"He had a wife and a family and a dog and a cat." Hee. Leave that in, no matter how this article is expanded or changed. It's like the guy (or gal) who legitimately worked in the phrase "eats shoots and leaves" in the Giant panda article. Classic.

I am pretty sure he didnt have a cat. Dog yes. Cat... um... pretty sure no...

Bob Woodward's book All The President's Men quotes Clawson as saying he had a cat. I'm putting it back.

Where in the book does it quote this. This is a line from the movie. Also I have checked with family members he did not have a cat, and it is also not revelent to who he was or what he has done. This is a bio, adding "he had a cat" does not add to his lagidity as a jornalsit or for his position with Nixon. It makes him sound like he was a joke.

Okay, I can understand your perspective, as a personal friend of the family -- However, I think this can be resolved.

Most Americans don't know who Clawson was. Those who do know, identify him primarily in connection with the "wife and a family and a dog and a cat" line. But why is he portrayed as saying that? Because he was distressed over the mistake he'd made. As part of CREEP's "ratfucking", he wrote a fake letter to make it look like Muskie slurred the Canadians and then bragged about it to a friend in the newspaper business -- someone who wrote for the very paper that he knew to be working on exposing the ratfucks.

This is your point -- that they think of him only in terms of one incident, overlooking the whole rest of his life. I agree that he was a lot more than that. Whatever good things he did in his life are just as worthy of inclusion as this one foolish mistake. Why don't you go ahead and fix up the article to talk about his life history and all his other accomplishments? The article as it exists is a stub. The more hard information it contains the less likely it will be that people will tolerate wisecracks like that. But that line is too good not to include some way. Therefore, I'm going to re-insert but contextualize it. See what you think of how I do it. --Bluejay Young 19:28, 10 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please not his name IS NOT KENNETH. It never was, I know that it was published as kenneth in quite a few places but thay had misprinted it! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.108.49.95 (talk) 18:15, 2 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I'm his youngest granddaughter, He didn't have a cat. Also, He was so much more than the Canuck letter, It's so frustrating. He was a wonderful journalist. Also, anyone who knows anything about him and his career knows that he was not a joke. I mean Nora Ephron wrote an article about him in New York Mag and the title was literally "Ken Clawson is no joke." ~ Sarah C. Clawson — Preceding unsigned comment added by 165.166.188.218 (talk) 19:01, 6 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]