Talk:Ken Whyld

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	Sports portal This article is supported by the sports and games work group.

Chess Low‑importance

	Chess portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Chess, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Chess on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChessWikipedia:WikiProject ChessTemplate:WikiProject Chesschess articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled[edit]

I was just wondering why this article gets sorted under 'K' in the 'chess writers' category, rather than under 'W', since his last name starts with 'W'. Cheers, FrankEldonDixon 18:08, 5 October 2007 (UTC) FrankEldonDixon, Frank Dixon, Kingston, Canada (Oct. 5, 2007, 1408 EDT (GMT +5)[reply]

By default, category sorts are done by the unadulterated page name. This is suboptimal for many pages, especially biographies. Category sorts can be specified on the right side of a pipe, e.g., [[Category:Chess writers|Whyld, Ken]]. (This is yet a different use for the pipe, which has a different function in piped wikilinks and yet another function in piped wikitable syntax.) Since many pages have a lot of categories, it is tedious and error prone to specify the sort over and over again. Recently DEFAULTSORT has been added to allow changing the default sort for all categories on the page: {{DEFAULTSORT:Whyld, Ken}}. This also has the side benefit of making the sorting for categories added automatically through templates used on the page (like {{chess-bio-stub}}) sort more usefully. This page hadn't been updated to use DEFAULTSORT yet. I fixed it. Quale 18:37, 5 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Chess Importance[edit]

Upgraded to High from Mid due to high linkage (currently 102 links) to article. ChessCreator (talk) 16:41, 17 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Changed back to mid after finding most of the links appear to be in references sections for books. ChessCreator (talk) 23:44, 17 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Well, that's hardly surprising as he wrote books on chess history! Carcharoth (talk) 18:55, 20 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Probably almost all of the links are due to him being a coauthor of The Oxford Companion to Chess, which is widely referenced. So I agree with Mid importance. Bubba73 (talk), 02:56, 21 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Changed it to Low importance. There are a lot of links to him due to coauthoring the Oxford Companion, but otherwise not that important. Bubba73 (talk), 20:16, 21 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Ken Whyld. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20030802085139/http://bcmchess.co.uk/news/obitwhyld.html to http://www.bcmchess.co.uk/news/obitwhyld.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:10, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]