Talk:Kenmore, New York

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cities, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of cities, towns and various other settlements on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CitiesWikipedia:WikiProject CitiesTemplate:WikiProject CitiesWikiProject Cities articles

New York (state): Western NY Mid‑importance

	New York (state) portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject New York (state), a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of New York on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New York (state)Wikipedia:WikiProject New York (state)Template:WikiProject New York (state)New York (state) articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Western New York (assessed as Mid-importance).

U.S. citizenship[edit]

There is a bug in MediaWiki such that the footnotes are repeast. AND: the 20K people in Kenmore are free to move about the entire USA. What is the problem is noting this?!? -- !!!! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.116.253.180 (talk • contribs) 07:25, 29 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Er, it's not notable? Ryūlóng 07:28, 29 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The bug in MediaWiki alone, such that the footnotes are listed twice: Is it already known?!? What is the bug number?!? -- 67.116.253.180 07:31, 29 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

No one knows. If you continue to use this article to try and find the bug, you will be blocked for disruption. Ryūlóng 07:33, 29 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Disruption does not equal bug reporting! -- 67.116.253.180 07:36, 29 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

In this case, it does. Now stop it now. Ryūlóng 07:36, 29 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

There is no bug - this is just some odd excuse to keep vandalising this article. MediaWiki issues belong on MediaWiki not here, and especially not this article. --Sagaciousuk ^(talk) 07:38, 29 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Indeed. Please refrain from further vandalizing. Michael 07:38, 29 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

There is a bug![edit]

But you MUST let the latest version sit there for, I dunno, five minutes and CONVINCE yourself ther is a bug that is specific to the latest version. Five minutes. See for youselves. -- 67.121.115.77 08:31, 29 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

No. There is no bug. There are no issues with other articles. Leave now. Ryūlóng 08:33, 29 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Wait, wait! Wikipedia uses Squid caches. You must let them time-out also before you see what it is that I mean. -- 64.175.42.128 09:35, 29 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

WP:SAND -- Omicronpersei8 (talk) 09:36, 29 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

We know about the bug. Test it somewhere THAT IS NOT THIS ARTICLE. If you continue to test in this article, you will be blocked from editting it. Try testing in the Sandbox, then tell us about it, because those links that you have CONSTANTLY ADDED TO THIS ARTICLE HAVE NOTHING TO DO WITH IT. Ryūlóng 09:37, 29 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Kenmore, New York. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:10, 4 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]