Talk:Kenneth Good (anthropologist)

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Accusation of pedophilia

see : Darkness in El Dorado

Criticisms

Just started this page as I am watching a TV programme about Anthropologists studying the Yanomamö and this Kenneth Goodand his work is prominant and seems notable. I am surprised there is no page. (Msrasnw (talk) 23:44, 10 January 2011 (UTC))[reply]

I think notability is most clearly evident via the book (widely held in libraries in the US - WorldCat - should this go in the article - subject to reviews etc)? and by the fact that his work with the Yanomamö has been subject to some criticism... I have avoided any details of this due to BLP worries but the page I feel is still useful. (Msrasnw (talk) 11:56, 11 January 2011 (UTC))[reply]

Child not woman

Re the revert https://en.m.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Kenneth_Good_(anthropologist)&diff=976230215&oldid=976227907

Self quote why I had changed to child when she was 9:

Child is a child, spade is a spade. Def: child (plural children) is a human being between the stages of birth and puberty....

WP:WEASEL in short.

I do not call him anything else.

Discuss why spade is not a spade. Or we can change the WP def of child.

And yes, I read the ref. report and know what cultural relativism is.

Zezen (talk) 21:46, 1 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The article says "In keeping with community wishes, he was betrothed to his future wife when she was about 9 years old. They began living near each other and consummated the marriage when she was about 14, as is typical in Yanomami culture.[3] However, the Yanomami people do not record individuals' ages beyond two years, making her exact age difficult to determine; Good himself later estimated these ages to be closer to 12-13 and 15-16, respectively."

So a form of engagement was at age 9 (or 12-13) and something akin to marriage and intercourse at 14 (or 15-16), so it doesn't sound that she was prepubescent. Also from the NPR source:

"Ken, what's the criticism that bothered you the most?

K. GOOD: That she was a little girl. That I had married a little girl, and it was an abuse. These people only live to be about 45 or so. A 15-year-old girl in their culture is not the same as a 15-year-old - a 15-year-old here is totally immature. She's a little kid still. She'd probably chewing gum at the mall, and in Yanomami culture, she's a woman. She's a full-fledged woman. She's doing all of women's chores, and she's probably pregnant or has a baby. Now, you say, well, that's them, you know? What do you know? They're Indians. Well, I'm sorry - this all occurred within the confines of their communal structure."

Furthermore, the article is clear on the ages. So I think it should stay as it is. MartinezMD (talk) 22:23, 1 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, you convinced me. Zezen (talk) 13:01, 2 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Article link

NOTE: Main article link ' is incorrect. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2603:8001:723F:BA73:E025:C06C:B390:646F (talk) 02:57, 3 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

It isn't wrong. It's a redirect to this article since the son is notable only for his connection to the father. There is no separate article for him. MartinezMD (talk) 03:03, 3 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]