Talk:Kenny McCormick/GA1
Appearance
GA Review
[edit]Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Staring GA review. Jezhotwells (talk) 20:50, 16 July 2009 (UTC)
Quick fail criteria assessment
- The article completely lacks reliable sources – see Wikipedia:Verifiability.
- The topic is treated in an obviously non-neutral way – see Wikipedia:Neutral point of view.
- There are cleanup banners that are obviously still valid, including cleanup, wikify, NPOV, unreferenced or large numbers of fact, clarifyme, or similar tags.
- The article is or has been the subject of ongoing or recent, unresolved edit wars.
- The article specifically concerns a rapidly unfolding current event with a definite endpoint.
No problems found when checking against quick fail criteria, moving on to substantive review. Jezhotwells (talk) 20:54, 16 July 2009 (UTC)
Checking against GA criteria
[edit]- It is reasonably well written.
- a (prose):
- b (MoS):
- a (prose):
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (references):
Needs references from reliable sources for the charcters role in veido gamesOk cites now added. Jezhotwells (talk) 19:32, 19 July 2009 (UTC)
- b (citations to reliable sources):
- c (OR):
- a (references):
- It is broad in its scope.
- a (major aspects):
- b (focused):
- a (major aspects):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars etc.:
- No edit wars etc.:
- It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):
- b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
- Just needs references for the video games aspect. On hold. Jezhotwells (talk) 21:06, 16 July 2009 (UTC)
Done
- Just needs references for the video games aspect. On hold. Jezhotwells (talk) 21:06, 16 July 2009 (UTC)
- Ok, pass GA
- Pass/Fail: