Talk:Kent and East Sussex Railway

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Fair use rationale for Image:Cts457.jpg[edit]

Image:Cts457.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 19:30, 29 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Headcorn & Maidstone Junction Light Railway[edit]

I notice that there is no mention of this line, which did receive an Act of Parliament although it was not built apart for a short section at Tovil.[1] Would this line merit its own page? Mjroots (talk) 22:55, 21 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Have started a page, but need help with template. Mjroots 14:49, 2 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Copyvio?[edit]

It has become clear that large sections of this article were probably directly cut and pasted from other sources. See the current diff. A lot of the article appears to have come from the Colonel Stephens Society website. Either they have copied Wikipedia, or Wikipedia had copied them. I don't know. I'll continue to rewrite the article over the next few days, and hopefully the issue will be resolved. Mjroots (talk) 06:27, 28 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:TRAMM201.jpg may be deleted[edit]

I have tagged File:TRAMM201.jpg, which is in use in this article for deletion because it does not have a copyright tag. If a copyright tag is not added within seven days the image will be deleted. --Chris 09:50, 28 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Rolling stock[edit]

Just wondering whether the reference to Lydd in relation to the Bodiam No. 3 Terrier should be a reference to Lydd Town or Lydd-on-Sea? Lamberhurst (talk) 12:17, 7 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

It was Lydd Town. Mjroots (talk) 11:09, 19 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Renaming[edit]

Better if the and is replaced with &

Vandalism[edit]

Tenterden renamed Rolvenden Parkway in 1903? The SECR relieving themselves in the public toilets in Station Road? I'm too much of a newby to know how to fix just these without affecting the rest of the article, but someone should do it - this is actually a very good article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.152.20.43 (talk) 12:19, 4 April 2012 (UTC) Found a couple more: "Mixed trains ran until they felt less mixed" and "This is telling in itself as Colonel Stephens was renowned for liking children when he was alive."[reply]

Xth longest[edit]

"Once the K&ESR have re-instated 13½-miles between Tenterden Town and Robertsbridge, This would make it the Ninth longest preserved Standard Gauge railway in Great Britain." "This totals a distance of over 11½-miles in length (Making it the sixth longest Standard Gauge railway line in the United Kingdom as of June 2012)." This seems to be a contradiction, I've marked both statements as 'citation needed', though maybe they just need deleting if nobody has the citation to correct them? 90.206.228.23 (talk) 11:11, 22 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on Kent and East Sussex Railway. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers. —cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 13:53, 18 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Kent and East Sussex Railway. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:46, 4 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Kent_and_East_Sussex_Railway&oldid=1205380561"