Talk:Kepler-451
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
.jpg){kind=small}
 | On 16 June 2024, it was proposed that this article be moved from 2MASS J19383260+4603591 to Kepler-451. The result of the discussion was moved. |
Requested move 16 June 2024
[edit]- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: moved. (non-admin closure) Safari ScribeEdits! Talk! 16:53, 23 June 2024 (UTC)
2MASS J19383260+4603591 → Kepler-451 – For consistency with all other stars with planets discovered by Kepler. New title fits all criteria for article titles, it is natural, recognizable, precise, concise and consistent. Old title is not natural concise, and consistent. 21 Andromedae (talk) 16:04, 16 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support, simpler designation that's had some use and consistent with other stars with Kepler designations. Whether this system actually has planets (which is unclear) isn't relevant. SevenSpheres (talk) 19:10, 16 June 2024 (UTC)
- There was a similar discussion about Kepler-429. Though thinking about it, what about KOI-126, an eclipsing triple star system also known as Kepler-469? There are enough papers about it to establish notability, so it could have its own article, but should the Kepler designation be used as the title? It would be consistent, but KOI-126 definitely doesn't have known planets and its Kepler designation has never been used in the literature. SevenSpheres (talk) 19:20, 16 June 2024 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.