Talk:Kevington, Victoria

Australia: Places / Victoria Low‑importance

	Australia portal Kevington, Victoria is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Australian places (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Victoria (assessed as Low-importance).
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia, or the State Library of Victoria.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

On 16 April 2023, it was proposed that this article be moved from Kevington to Kevington, Victoria. The result of the discussion was moved.

Requested move 16 April 2023[edit]

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) -- Maddy from Celeste (WAVEDASH) 19:42, 23 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kevington → Kevington, Victoria – Is the pop 43 place really primary? Though it gets more views most Google and Books results are for the London one but the 1st is probably due to my location. Images is mixed though. This one could be named after the London one suggesting it has more long-term significance. Suggest creating a DAB at the base name. Crouch, Swale (talk) 18:02, 16 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Support - This article was created well before the London article, hence it using the unambiguated name rather than any claim to primary status. Agree that a DAB page is the bext outcome. -- Mattinbgn (talk)
Support cf Kevington (disambiguation) In ictu oculi (talk) 23:19, 16 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Easy support as proposed, nice find. Normally a city should have primary topic, of course, but not when the population is this tiny Red Slash 21:44, 19 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.