Talk:Keynsham/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Casliber (talk · contribs) 04:37, 2 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Aha! Another place my ancestors came from (though it was recorded as Gloucestershire...) - anyway.... Casliber (talk · contribs) 04:37, 2 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

It is home to memorial park, - "a memorial park? or "It is home to Memorial Park,"
Capitalised as proper name
Be nice to expand the first para of History a little - you mention scattered Roman remains and then all you serve up is a couple of lousy coffins :)
Added a bit re mosaic etc
Again, any political colour that can be added to the governance section all the better. reads a little generic as is.
Added town & district council wards + parties & MP
...six left-bank fields... link or explain
Reworded
I don't get much of a feel for Memorial Park - is it mainly woodland or mainly open-space fields? Any other features to it?
Expanded this quite a bit
Culture section could be buffed some more. How long's the festival been going?
Added a bit - festival only since late 1990s
Noteworthy residents section should be converted into prose - surely there is some Bill Bailey material which can make a good intro?
Done - there are a couple of Bailey comments about Keynsham on Couchtripper but nothing I thought was right to use.

Anyway, seems a little sterile compared with some of the other Somerset towns, but not a huge amount to do. Casliber (talk · contribs) 06:01, 2 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your edits and comments - hopefully addressed above.— Rod talk 21:13, 2 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose): b (MoS):
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail: I ummed and aahed about this, as I feels it does lack a little something, but I don't recall seeing much else written about the town anywhere, so am happy that it is a good board coverage of available sourcing. Casliber (talk · contribs) 04:45, 3 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]