Talk:Khatu Shyam Temple

Hinduism Low‑importance

	Hinduism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Hinduism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Hinduism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HinduismWikipedia:WikiProject HinduismTemplate:WikiProject HinduismHinduism articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

India: Rajasthan Low‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Rajasthan (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article was last assessed in April 2012.

Untitled[edit]

I've reinstated the original page on Barbarika, as a separate article. This Khatushyamji article seems to be on the specific manifestation of Barbarika, described at [1]. If the Barbarika article is to be merged back into this article, the original MB story should be acknowledged - it is not quite the one stated here. In addition, the transliteration of the names in this article should be standardised, and this article tidied up in general. Imc 22:14, 23 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I am reinstating the original on Babarika as this not about the classical Babarika of the Mahabharta, but of a regional variation. The original Mahbharata story is not acknowledged. --Redtigerxyz ^Talk 13:26, 18 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

WP:INDIA Banner/Rajasthan workgroup Addition[edit]

Note: {{WP India}} Project Banner with Rajasthan workgroup parameters was added to this article talk page because the article falls under Category:Rajasthan or its subcategories. Should you feel this addition is inappropriate , please undo my changes and update/remove the relavent categories to the article -- TinuCherian ^{(Wanna Talk?)} - 07:19, 23 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Use of a single source throughout this article[edit]

This article is taken verbatim from the website http://www.Khatushyam.in and has multiple issues with manual of style, copy editing and unsourced materials. Over the next few days, I'll try my best to trim this article and to update it with inclusion of additional reliable sources. EngineerFromVega^T 00:06, 24 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Khatushyam. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140214222414/http://devasthan.rajasthan.gov.in/images/Sikar/khatushyamji.htm to http://devasthan.rajasthan.gov.in/images/Sikar/khatushyamji.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:20, 5 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]