Talk:Khewra, Jhelum
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Claimed official website
[edit]Anyone think khewra.webs.com is really an official website? --Ronz (talk) 17:18, 20 April 2011 (UTC)
The contents of the Khewra page were merged into Khewra, Jhelum. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected page, please see its history; for the discussion at that location, see its talk page. |
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Khewra, Punjab. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120209043508/http://www.nrb.gov.pk/lg_election/union.asp?district=12&dn=Jhelum to http://www.nrb.gov.pk/lg_election/union.asp?district=12&dn=Jhelum
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:09, 5 May 2017 (UTC)
Duplicate/contradictory content
[edit]The merge of this page in 2016 seems to have duplicated some content and introduced conflicting statements. Is the population 35,000 or 80,000? Do we need both infoboxes? Jessicapierce (talk) 23:41, 4 March 2018 (UTC)