Talk:Khojaly, Nagorno-Karabakh

	Azerbaijan portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Azerbaijan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Azerbaijan-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AzerbaijanWikipedia:WikiProject AzerbaijanTemplate:WikiProject AzerbaijanAzerbaijan articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Armenia

	Khojaly, Nagorno-Karabakh is within the scope of WikiProject Armenia, an attempt to improve and better organize information in articles related or pertaining to Armenia and Armenians. If you would like to contribute or collaborate, you could edit the article attached to this page or visit the project page for further information.ArmeniaWikipedia:WikiProject ArmeniaTemplate:WikiProject ArmeniaArmenian articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Artsakh

	Khojaly, Nagorno-Karabakh is within the scope of WikiProject Artsakh, an attempt to improve and better organize information in articles related or pertaining to Artsakh and Artsakhians. If you would like to contribute or collaborate, you could edit the article attached to this page or visit the project page for further information.ArtsakhWikipedia:WikiProject ArtsakhTemplate:WikiProject ArtsakhArtsakh articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Comments[edit]

They died outside of Khojaly. Even DeWaal confirms that. VartanM (talk) 06:17, 23 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Twinned city of Lidice[edit]

Sources:

Includes a picture of the event - with street names/signs to be exchanged.
Czech website
Czech radio news
Azerbaijani website
Lidice memorial

Tuscumbia (talk) 17:32, 26 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

First and fourth sources are Azeri (not valid). The second one says that they tooked information from the site bakililar.az and I think that You understand that this source also not valid. For the third source I can say, that unfortunately for You, Russian is my mother language and I have not find even a one word about twinning. There are only two points of view: Azeri and Armenian. Also there're a short summary of Czech party which says that they keep neutrality between two sides. In the fifth source there is only info about cultural programme and also no word about twinning. So, I'll wait little more time for real sources and if there were no neutral authoritius sources I would be obligated to revert false information. Sincerely Yours --Ліонкінг (talk) 19:05, 26 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Not valid? Says who? This is not about a historical information. Those are news agencies reporting the news. All the sources above are related to holding the event on commemoration of Khojaly Massacre at Lidice Memorial and exchanging street names. This has nothing to do with Russian being a mother tongue. I understand Russian well enough. The cities twinned. Reverting just because it suits your agenda is not acceptable. Czech party may say they keep neutrality but what does it have to do with two cities being twinned? Please feel free to explain.

If you find a source that says that Lidice administration "denies this info" as you claimed in your revert, then please present it. Otherwise, stop edit-warring. Tuscumbia (talk) 19:39, 26 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

To satisfy your quest for information that you were not able to find previously in your native tongue Russian, I re-post the same website of Czech radio with an article titled "Lidice twinned with Khojaly. Armenia is against" Hope the title by itself helps. Tuscumbia (talk) 19:53, 26 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

It has to be made clear that Azeris from the diaspora signed the agreement and NOT representatives of the present city. Otherwise readers will not understand. -- PhJ (talk) 12:26, 28 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Where do you get that it was signed by diaspora? The agreement was signed by city administrations of Khojaly (in exile) and Lidice. 15:10, 28 February 2011 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dighapet (talk • contribs)

Please do not delete information. "Representatives of the Azeri administration of Khojaly in exile" will do. Actually, exiled mayors of a town can be called diaspora. "City administration of Khojaly (in exile)" really sounds ridiculous, like Kommissarische Reichsregierung of Germany. -- PhJ (talk) 20:20, 28 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Can someone comment on the de facto and de jure status of this city as mentioned in the recent edit? --Muzammil (talk) 19:56, 2 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Khojaly (city). Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20111027191428/http://en.apa.az/news.php?id=115717 to http://en.apa.az/news.php?id=115717

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 03:37, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Armenian name of Ivanyan[edit]

So, since Armenian control in the city has ended, there is no need to include this de facto name in this article. 78.190.236.17 (talk) 23:37, 7 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

agreed, this question is under almost every city that was occupied by Nagarno Karabakh, obviously since it no longer exists, i think that all of the cities should be renamed to their Azerbaijani names Kingllama100 (talk) 16:21, 10 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I beleive that the article should retain its current title as it still seems to be the common name WP:COMMONNAME Nintentoad125 (talk) 16:44, 10 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]