Talk:Kim Gordon (designer)

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Articles for creation

	This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC articles
	This article was accepted from this draft on 14 January 2023 by reviewer Mattdaviesfsic (talk · contribs).

Biography: Arts and Entertainment

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the arts and entertainment work group.

Architecture

	Architecture portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchitectureWikipedia:WikiProject ArchitectureTemplate:WikiProject ArchitectureArchitecture articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Women

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WomenWikipedia:WikiProject WomenTemplate:WikiProject WomenWikiProject Women articles

Further discussion on references[edit]

This submission was declined on October 6th without any comments specifying why - just a general template about not meeting notability guidelines. I wrote on the reviewer's talk page hoping to better understand the reasoning behind declining, but received no response.

I am personally convinced that a number of the references are in depth, reliable, and independent from the source, especially the following:

https://www.latimes.com/business/la-fi-himi-kim-gordon-20181007-story.html

https://www.mydomaine.com/kim-gordon-healthy-home-design-ideas-5119866

https://www.latimes.com/business/realestate/hot-property/la-fi-hp-0507-kim-gordon-20160507-story.html

https://www.argonautnews.com/news/designer-extraordinaire/article_a903948b-22e2-5420-82bc-d87b2d015008.html

https://www.snyderdiamond.com/blog/Interior-Diviner-Kim-Gordon

https://csq.com/2020/06/designer-kim-gordons-market-defying-residential-havens/#.Y0BNHnZBxPY

https://www.californiahomedesign.com/house-tours/a-place-in-the-sun/

https://www.elledecor.com/design-decorate/house-interiors/a8690/glass-house/

All of these articles have multiple paragraphs about the subject. The Los Angeles Times is regarded as reliable as per WP:RSP. ELLE is not listed, but the discussion on the notice board suggests editors so far have considered it as reliable. As for C Suite Quarterly, Snyder Diamond, Argonaut News, MyDomaine, and California Home & Design, there has not been enough discussion by Wikipedia editors to form a consensus on their reliability, but all of them have in depth coverage and on first glance they seem to have decent editorial standards, so I thought this would definitely pass WP:SIGCOV. If not, I would appreciate some more detailed feedback about why it doesn't. Thanks Chagropango (talk) 07:38, 11 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

More improvements on tone and source[edit]

Since the draft was declined on 11 October by Bonadea there have been substantial improvements, including additional information and references about the subject's artistic style and coverage of that style in national and international media. The tone has also been improved in line with WP:NPOV.Chagropango (talk) 16:14, 21 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]