Talk:Kim Il Sung and Kim Jong Il badges

Kim Il Sung and Kim Jong Il badges has been listed as one of the Social sciences and society good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: May 31, 2018. (Reviewed version).

Korea Mid‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Korea, a collaborative effort to build and improve articles related to Korea. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how use this banner, please refer to the documentation.KoreaWikipedia:WikiProject KoreaTemplate:WikiProject KoreaKorea-related articles

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated working groups:
/
	This article is supported by WikiProject North Korea.
	This article is supported by one or more inactive working groups.

Culture Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Culture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of culture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CultureWikipedia:WikiProject CultureTemplate:WikiProject Cultureculture articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Heraldry and vexillology

Kim Il Sung and Kim Jong Il badges is within the scope of the Heraldry and vexillology WikiProject, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of heraldry and vexillology. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.Heraldry and vexillologyWikipedia:WikiProject Heraldry and vexillologyTemplate:WikiProject Heraldry and vexillologyheraldry and vexillology articles

GA Review[edit]

This review is transcluded from Talk:Kim Il-sung and Kim Jong-il badges/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: WPCW (talk · contribs) 20:05, 31 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The review of the article was at the time and date displayed at the end of the review. The review followed the Wikipedia good article criteria.

Well written

The article is appropriately structured, concise, and easily readable. The spelling and grammar in it are correct. The contents and format of the article are compliant with the Wikipedia manual of style.

Verifiable with no original research

The citations placed in the text support the facts and statements, and the sources included in an appropriate reference list. The sources for the article are from credible sources, predominantly academic books. The books are referenced correctly, including the page number. The links for electronic sources were checked and correctly working.

The article does not include any original research. When the text was checked using anti-plagiarism software, it did not find any plagiarism.

Broad in coverage

The reviewer had no previous knowledge of the topic and found the article sufficient to understand it. To a non-expert, there were no obvious issues about the breadth of coverage of the topic.

Neutral

The article takes an unbiased perspective on the topic, and additionally without any comments in the articles history or talk page concerning impartiality.

Stable

The article history and talk page do not show any evidence of ongoing debates about the articles text or editing wars.

Illustrated

The article illustrated with suitable captions underneath each photograph. A check of the photographs showed no issues about copyright infringements.

Summary

The article is fully compliant with the good article criteria without the need for any further amendments. WPCW (talk) 22:15, 31 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for conducting the review, WPCW.

I'm happy to hear that the article has passed. I'm particularly content that you deemed it comprehensive yet written so that it's understood by someone without prior knowledge; this is in my opinion the key to good writing.

I take pride in the fact that you found no issues that necessitated attention before you could pass the review. This is not always the case. If you find some errors or room for improvement later, just let me know. Thank you again! – Finnusertop (talk ⋅ contribs) 00:18, 1 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]