Talk:Kindersley

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Invite[edit]

Hi, you are graciously extended an invitation to join the Saskatchewan WikiProject and WikiProject Saskatchewan Communities & Neighbourhoods! The Saskatchewan WikiProject is a fairly new WikiProject. We are a group of editors who are dedicated to creating, revising, and expanding articles, lists, categories, and Wikiprojects, to do with anything Saskatchewan.

We look forward to welcoming you to the project!

SriMesh | talk 03:03, 2 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]


Lead Paragraph[edit]

  • 1. Context - Neighbourhood geographically localised community located within Saskatoon. describing the category or field in which the idea belongs.
  • 2. Characterization - appearance, age, gender, educational level, vocation or occupation, financial status, marital status, social status, cultural background, hobbies, sexual orientation, religious beliefs, ambitions, motivations, personality, what the term refers to as used in the given context.
  • 3. Explanation - deeper meaning and background.
  • 4. Compare and contrast - how it relates to other topics, if appropriate. need to add about neighborhood pop in comparison to small town population comparison
  • 5. Criticism - include criticism if there has been significant, notable criticism. need to compare to other neighborhoods in Saskatoon when neighborhoods finish up...and look at the comglomerated statistics from each.

SriMesh | talk 03:03, 2 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Application for city status[edit]

Just in response to the citation tag on this point, it was an article in the local Kindersley newspaper. Unfortunately I no longer have the issue nor is it online. 23skidoo (talk) 02:36, 8 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Kindersley. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:39, 6 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

=Infobox population[edit]

Article gives the 2021 census population figure - which is the exact same as the Infobox which says 2016. Should the infobox be updated to 2021? I doubt Kindersley's population would have stated the exact same. 23skidoo (talk) 17:48, 12 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]