Talk:King's Own Royal Regiment (Lancaster)

Military history: British / European / Early Modern / American Revolution / Napoleonic era / World War I / World War II C‑class

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history

C

This article has been rated as C-class on the project's quality scale.

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	British military history task force
	European military history task force
	Early Modern warfare task force (c. 1500 – c. 1800)
	American Revolutionary War task force
	Napoleonic era task force (c. 1792 – 1815)
	World War I task force
	World War II task force

Merger proposal

I propose merging the 2nd Tangier Regiment with this article as:

They are the same regiment
There is nothing in this stubby article that is not in the one on the King's Own
They were only known as the 2nd Tangier Regiment for four years
It is consistent with the article on the other (1st) Tangier Regiment which redirects to Queen's Royal Regiment (West Surrey)

Lozleader (talk) 16:24, 21 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Makes sense to me. Andrew Gray (talk) 21:00, 21 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Agree. Merge. SonofSetanta (talk) 08:47, 4 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 8 external links on King's Own Royal Regiment (Lancaster). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.regiments.org/regiments/uk/depot/1873.htm
Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.warpath.orbat.com/regts/kings_own.htm
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160304100038/http://www.kingsownmuseum.plus.com/war1914-17.htm to http://www.kingsownmuseum.plus.com/war1914-17.htm
Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.regiments.org/regiments/uk/cav/RAC.htm
Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.regiments.org/regiments/uk/inf/004KORR.htm
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150402105716/http://www.kingsownmuseum.plus.com/museum02.htm to http://www.kingsownmuseum.plus.com/museum02.htm
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130528220855/http://warpath.orbat.com/ to http://www.warpath.orbat.com/
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130129062227/http://www.ra39-45.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/ to http://www.ra39-45.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:31, 29 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on King's Own Royal Regiment (Lancaster). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:37, 6 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on King's Own Royal Regiment (Lancaster). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:53, 10 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]