Talk:King Conquer

Notability

They are a legitimate band. I really don't see the purpose of deleting information that some people may find useful. All the information is correct, and isn't hurting anyone.

Oh, I don't doubt it. Problem is, you can't just put anything you want into Wikipedia, otherwise the encyclopedia would become filled with pages of non-notable garage bands and such that few people would really want to have lying around uselessly. I'll tell you what, if you can make some claim to notability or provide one reference, I'll remove the speedy-delete tag. Regards, Lothar von Richthofen (talk) 20:35, 30 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

www.myspace.com/kingconquer
www.last.fm/music/King+Conquer
www.facebook.com/kingconquerfl
www.metalunderground.com/news/details.cfm?newsid=60269
www.sputnikmusic.com/news.php?newsid=14685
www.lambgoat.com/news/view.aspx?id=14226

They are pretty well known in regards to being a death metal band. I have provided some sites with information on the band itself, as well as a couple sites with articles with news about the band. I would say that the words "news" in regards to the bands actions and existence is considered notability.

P.S. Thanks for the chance. Appreciate it. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Erikwnilsson (talk • contribs) 20:54, 30 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I have removed the tag, as promised. What you need to do now is put the sources in the article itself as citations. I personally am iffy as to whether or not this would be considered notable by some other editors with harsher notability standards than I, but I'll let you develop the article so it at least has a chance to stand up to them. If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to ask me (preferably on my talk page). ~~ Lothar von Richthofen (talk) 21:12, 30 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

1776

I can't seem to find a legitimate source announcing new information on their second album. Anyone have some coverage? • GunMetal Angel 09:29, 6 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on King Conquer. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 19:47, 21 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]