Talk:Kingdom of the Suebi

Galicia Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Galicia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Galicia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GaliciaWikipedia:WikiProject GaliciaTemplate:WikiProject GaliciaGalicia articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Spain Mid‑importance

	Spain portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Spain, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Spain on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SpainWikipedia:WikiProject SpainTemplate:WikiProject SpainSpain articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Portugal Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Portugal, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Portugal on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PortugalWikipedia:WikiProject PortugalTemplate:WikiProject PortugalPortugal articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Portugal To-do:

Find correct name The airport is not listed as João Paulo II anywhere. The airport's own website calls itself simply Ponta Delgada, and has no mention of João Paulo.

Improve key articles to Good article

Improve

Review

Category:History of Portugal: lots to remove there
Template:Regions of Portugal: statistical (NUTS3) subregions and intercommunal entities are confused; they are not the same in all regions, and should be sublisted separately in each region: intermunicipal entities are sometimes larger and split by subregions (e.g. the Metropolitan Area of Lisbon has two subregions), some intercommunal entities are containing only parts of subregions. All subregions should be listed explicitly and not assume they are only intermunicipal entities (which accessorily are not statistic subdivisions but real administrative entities, so they should be listed below, probably using a smaller font: we can safely eliminate the subgrouping by type of intermunicipal entity from this box).

Requests

See Requested articles

Assess

Help assessing articles.

Need images

Translate from Portuguese Wikipedia

Wikify

Vote:

Watch this list — Edit this list

Former countries

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Former countries, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of defunct states and territories (and their subdivisions). If you would like to participate, please join the project.Former countriesWikipedia:WikiProject Former countriesTemplate:WikiProject Former countriesformer country articles

Middle Ages Low‑importance

	Middle Ages portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Middle Ages, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Middle Ages on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Middle AgesWikipedia:WikiProject Middle AgesTemplate:WikiProject Middle AgesMiddle Ages articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Classical Greece and Rome Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Classical Greece and Rome, a group of contributors interested in Wikipedia's articles on classics. If you would like to join the WikiProject or learn how to contribute, please see our project page. If you need assistance from a classicist, please see our talk page.Classical Greece and RomeWikipedia:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeTemplate:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeClassical Greece and Rome articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

User:Srnec/Suevic Kingdom of Galicia[edit]

There may be some information in the above link that is not captured here. If anybody wants to take a look, or edit the text in my subpage, go ahead. Srnec (talk) 16:19, 15 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

wrong map[edit]

I think the map should be removed or changed somehow, due to two reasons: it is mixing the Suebic Kingdom with Galicia/Galiza Kingdom (for example, Asturias or León were part of the former but not of the latter), and the extension of the Basque People which is totally wrong, covering parts of Cantabria which have not been Basque ever . I think that the Visigothic Kingdom never comprised the Basque Lands (even nominally), either, as it is suggested in the map. It´s all rather messed up and anachronistical.--Xareu bs (talk) 07:52, 3 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Toponyms/ Place Names[edit]

I put the link of the Portuguese city of Gondomar, bigger and more closer to a region where the Suevi more settled, and to Braga, their center (not the only region, obviously, between the various historical Suebic areas of Galicia, Portugal etc., all important in their setting, but eventually a higher center of "colonization"). I kept Baltar connecting to the Galician municipality (for the same reasons and for greater vision of both countries), despite the Portuguese parish being too close to this center (The corresponding Galician ones are also near the border of this portuguese region curiously). I think however that a link of both names to disambiguation pages would be more correct - and for better and more information to readers on both names and all identical names in Portugal and Galicia etc.. --LuzoGraal (talk) 00:02, 19 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Actually, as can be consulted in the history of the article, I wrote that section back in January of this same year. I left the toponyms first linking to the disambiguation pages, but after receiving a warning -"too much disambiguation links, baby"- I mechanically link everything to my personal closer experiences, a mistake which was later corrected by yourself. But apparently its not only me: the edition which changed the 'status quo' was not mine, but another's: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Suebic_Kingdom_of_Galicia&oldid=478024459. I agree with you, but other editors mechanically "hate" disambiguation pages. Cheers.--Froaringus (talk) 15:10, 19 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Froaringus, although I have always been in good faith in that my edition - and in the reasons I gave, I have to admit that I regret the tone I used in the justification (if it was something radical and unfair). A hasty reaction against what would eventually be your intention or the intention of other editors to choose only Galician cities, municipalities etc.. If somehow went wrong on this "judgment" or was unfair, as it was, I apologize. And even incidentally one case out of two references, all the rest of that chapter and the whole article dismisses it. Its generally very impartial, vast, with references to both countries and with good quality. And if you, Froaringus - if you are the main editor, I want to give you congratulations for the great work and the great quality of the article. And to thank you, as a reader I am.

Both the current Galicia and Northern Portugal were of great importance in the Suevic kingdom of Gallaecia (hopefully correcting some tone here or exaggeration in the centralization in one region in my messages) Gondomar, Galician and Portuguese, both are important). The Center of Portugal much less, obviously, but with signs and even major archeology, interestingly - even in what is almost the beginning of the "southern" climate and the geographic "beginning" of the South of Portugal, as the Beira Baixa, south of Serra da Estrela, to give an example (Suevic monumentality, minted coins etc.).

As for disambiguation pages, they also have an handicap, sometimes in the way to expand in current or future editions, they cover the same names in other regions or continents (not the case maybe, but can happen) inspired by Galician and Portuguese lands,or others, either by settlement or genealogy in other places, outside the area with "real" Suevic origin. A curiosity: Gondomar, both Galician and Portuguese, are also inspired by the Visigoth king of the same name, in 611s AD., After the conquest, but continues to make sense its mention in our view. The disambiguation was a more informative, however the wikipedia has its rules, we have to accept. Cheers.----LuzoGraal (talk) 22:12, 19 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, friend. Na, it's Ok. You were constructive all the time, and nobody got hurt here. I'm not sure of who is the main editor, because it already was a large article when I began working at it, but I surely put a lot of effort here, and I tried to maintain the article as equilibrated and rich as possible. Abraços.--Froaringus (talk) 16:21, 20 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Latin?[edit]

latin was certainly not the only language even in the courts. Much like even in karl the great's court (charlemagne), germanic dialects were spoken. The article must reflect this so as not to overstate assimilation. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.100.90.192 (talk) 04:18, 8 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Kingdom of the Suebi. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:04, 10 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Were the Suebi "Swabians"?[edit]

Except for the transformation of an initial [s] before most consonants in modern German to [ʃ] and the vowel [a] to [e] (vowels are usually unstable over any extended time), Suebi looks like a cognate of Schwaben, an unofficial region of Germany that now comprises an area around the old national (and current) federal borders of Bavaria and Baden-Wuerttemberg. See also "Angles" in England and their "Saxon" buddies or Norsemen/Normans in Normandy. Does this have documentation or is this simply a folk etymology on my part unduly tempting as an analogy? Pbrower2a (talk) 04:38, 18 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This article appears to use the terms Suevi, Suebi, and Swabian interchangably, which is confuisng, and, as mentioned above, possibly inaccurate. Acwilson9 (talk) 04:06, 18 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]