Talk:Kingfisher
There is a request, submitted by Catfurball, for an audio version of this article to be created. For further information, see WikiProject Spoken Wikipedia. The rationale behind the request is: "Important". |
Untitled
[edit]Bright blue kingfisher feathers were used in jewelry in early China since the T'ang Dynasty (AD 618-907). The birds, the water kingfisher (Alcedinidae) and the wood kingfisher (Halcyonidae), were common in China until demand for their feathers may have caused their extinction.
Sorry, forgot to sign in before the edit adding the Mythology section title. I needed this information, so if anyone has expertise, please add some info in! Or, replace it with an appropriate 'info wanted' Wiki bit... Jekteir 11:30, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
Kingfisher Eyes
[edit]Your article on kingfisher mentions that a kingfisher's eye lens has evolved into an egg-shape. Here is the excerpt:
"They are able to see well both in air and under water. To do this, their eyes have evolved an egg-shaped lens able to focus in the two different environments."
This seems to counter Wikipedia's NPOV least in regards to evolution vs. creation. I think the above statement would need to be verified in order to stay in Wikipedia. Or, perhaps take the evolution assumption out entirely and edit the statement to read:
"They are able to see well both in air and under water. To do this, their eyes have an egg-shaped lens able to focus in the two different environments.
This would express a more neutral point of view. Is there any agreement? 224329 14:39, 21 September 2007 (UTC)
- No. This is a global scientific article which is entitled to quote established scientific theory. There is no way that American quasi-religious mumbo-jumbo has any place in any biological article, let alone to have equal status. Jimfbleak 15:22, 21 September 2007 (UTC)
- Taken to its logical conclusion everyone of the thousands of taxoboxes for animal and plant species would go, since they assume that species are related, whereas the creationists have them created distinctly. Jimfbleak 06:51, 22 September 2007 (UTC)
This picture
[edit]Do you need it?
-- Myosotis Scorpioides 21:53, 29 November 2009 (UTC)
Ethymology of the name Kingfisher
[edit]Ad: The etymology of kingfisher (Alcedo atthis) is obscure; the term comes from king's fisher, but why that name was applied is not known.[6]
Maybe it relates with the fact that kingfisher was the personal heraldic bird of the Czech king Wenceslas IV (Václav IV).
212.111.31.107 (talk) 07:47, 26 January 2011 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Kingfisher. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110604230539/http://www.iucnredlist.org/apps/redlist/details/142177/0 to http://www.iucnredlist.org/apps/redlist/details/142177/0
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:46, 6 May 2017 (UTC)