Talk:Kings Bay Affair

	Norway portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Norway, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Norway on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.NorwayWikipedia:WikiProject NorwayTemplate:WikiProject NorwayNorway articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Politics Mid‑importance

	Politics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Regarding the introduction

I don't much care for the tone of the introduction... On the surface it may be correct; but it's also worth mentioning that the Conservative coalition Government that followed Gerhardsen, lasted for **less than a month**, and was followed by **a new Labour-party Government, also lead by Gerhardsen**. So it didn't have that much impact.

The introduction also make it sounds like Kings Bay marked the end of Labour-governments in Norway, but that was simply not the case.

Also "end of the Gerhardsen dynasty" is misleading... First off, as mention, he formed a new Government in less than a month. Second, it makes it sound like the Gerhardsen-clan had lead Norway for centuries - but it really was *just* Einar Gerhardsen. Yes, he had a very long tenure as the Norwegian Prime Minister, but it was hardly a "dynasty". — Preceding unsigned comment added by 196.52.32.10 (talk) 21:00, 28 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Kings Bay Affair. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100214061221/http://www.kingsbay.no/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=117&Itemid=135 to http://www.kingsbay.no/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=117&Itemid=135

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:42, 7 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]