Talk:Kir royal

Food and drink: Beverages Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Food and drink, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of food and drink related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Food and drinkWikipedia:WikiProject Food and drinkTemplate:WikiProject Food and drinkFood and drink articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Related taskforces:
/
	This article is within the scope of the Beverages Task Force, a task force which is currently considered to be inactive.

Food and Drink task list:

To edit this page, select here

Here are some tasks you can do for WikiProject Food and drink:

Help bring these Top Importance articles currently B Status or below up to GA status: Agaricus bisporus (i.e. mushroom), Beef, Bread, Curry, Drink, Food, Ham and eggs, Soy sauce, Sushi, Yogurt
Bring these Top Importance articles currently at GA status up to FA status: Beer, French cuisine, Sugar
Bring these High Importance articles currently at GA status up to FA status: Apple, Burger King, Fish
Participate in project-related deletion discussions.
Delete unrelated trivia sections found in articles. Please review WP:Trivia and WP:Handling trivia to learn how to do this.
Add the {{WikiProject Food and drink}} project banner to food and drink related articles and content to help bring them to the attention of members. For a complete list of banners for WikiProject Food and drink and its child projects, select here.
Provide photographs and images for Category:Wikipedia requested images of food
Consider joining this project's Assessment task force. List any project ideas in this section

Note: These lists are transcluded from the project's tasks pages.

coupla things...

I've always seen this written (and pronounced) as Royale.

Also, why not choose either Kir or Kir Royale as the article and give the variant as part of it. Without further elucidation, e.g., origin, inventor, description etc., all this page does is force the reader to go to the Kir page to see what the "original" is. Zlama (talk) 03:46, 2 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 31 May 2015

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: Move. Cúchullain ^t/c 19:34, 18 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kir Royal (cocktail) → Kir Royal – Primary meaning. The only other item on the dab page is not nearly as significant as the cocktail Since there are only two items on the dab page, it can be eliminated and this is not a multi-move. --Relisted. George Ho (talk) 01:31, 8 June 2015 (UTC) Srnec (talk) 01:44, 31 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Comment isn't it Kir Royale ? [1][2] -- 65.94.43.89 (talk) 03:44, 31 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I see a case for a merge or redirect here to the main Kir article since this article is one sentence.--67.68.29.99 (talk)! — Preceding undated comment added 04:03, 31 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know if there is enough out there to build this article up or if it should be merged, but Kir Royale is probably a more common spelling. Srnec (talk) 14:39, 31 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The spelling is definitely 'kir royal' as 'kir' is masculin. -- Wgsimon (talk) 09:28, 8 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

That would be the French spelling. English spelling does not follow French just because the French spell it one way, the English spelling is not required to follow. Just as we spell it "chief" and not "chef" , etc. -- 70.51.202.183 (talk) 04:34, 9 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with the principal. The question in this case is weather kir royale has been assimilated into the English language or if it's a French name which is used in English and habitually spelt incorrectly. -- Wgsimon (talk) 09:36, 17 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Comment. It should be "Kir royal" without capitalisation as it is a common name. Speco Lagram (talk) 11:05, 1 June 2015 (UTC).[reply]
- kir royale ? -- 65.94.43.89 (talk) 02:40, 2 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support. Clearly a primary topic. JIP | Talk 21:46, 8 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- And what is the primary spelling? Isn't with the "e" attached? -- 70.51.202.183 (talk) 04:32, 9 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  - I've always seen it written as "Kir Royal" without the "e". JIP | Talk 08:21, 9 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Strong support and add a hatnote, per WP:TWODABS, WP:PRIMARY and WP:PTM (the German TV-series just being a partial title match). Cavarrone 09:52, 10 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Kir Royale as this NGRAM shows Royale is far more common than Royal --Mike Cline (talk) 03:06, 12 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Strong support for Kir royal. -- Wgsimon (talk) 09:25, 17 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

NOTE "Kir royal" would be the French spelling, while "Kir Royale" would be the English spelling (the "e" is an affectation of false French, since in French, there is no "e", as "kir" is masculine, and the "e" attaches to "royal" with feminine nouns. Also "royal" would be lower case due to French grammar. Thus the English term is fake French, being "Kir Royale") -- 67.70.32.20 (talk) 03:19, 7 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Blacklisted Links Found on Kir Royal

Cyberbot II has detected links on Kir Royal which have been added to the blacklist, either globally or locally. Links tend to be blacklisted because they have a history of being spammed or are highly inappropriate for Wikipedia. The addition will be logged at one of these locations: local or global If you believe the specific link should be exempt from the blacklist, you may request that it is white-listed. Alternatively, you may request that the link is removed from or altered on the blacklist locally or globally. When requesting whitelisting, be sure to supply the link to be whitelisted and wrap the link in nowiki tags. Please do not remove the tag until the issue is resolved. You may set the invisible parameter to "true" whilst requests to white-list are being processed. Should you require any help with this process, please ask at the help desk.

Below is a list of links that were found on the main page:

http://www.cocktail-guru.com/kir-royale.html
Triggered by \bguru\b on the local blacklist

If you would like me to provide more information on the talk page, contact User:Cyberpower678 and ask him to program me with more info.

From your friendly hard working bot.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 01:00, 14 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Kir Royal. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140209000439/http://www.cocktail-guru.com/kir-royale.html to http://www.cocktail-guru.com/kir-royale.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:29, 11 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]