Talk:Knox Dolomite

Merger discussion

I propose merging to the Knox Supergroup for the following reasons. 1) "Knox Dolomite" is part of the Knox Supergroup and is not even the proper nomenclature for the rock unit being described. 2) The body of this article was a copy and paste from another article by the same author, this is evident because it is describing the "Kerbal Formation" formation not the "Knox Dolomite" 3) There are no valid references for this article. Zigismon (talk) 20:14, 30 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The main discussion for this is occurring over at Talk:Knox Supergroup, no need to duplicate here. Lavalizard101 (talk) 10:55, 2 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If this article is not merged, the result should be Draftify as this article is clearly not ready for the namespace. Thanks. Wibbit23 (talk) 17:19, 23 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose draftification. This is the standard article size and layout for geological formations. That you appear to not know this suggests that you are going about random articles trying to find things to edit. Lavalizard101 (talk) 20:16, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]