Jump to content

Talk:Koitajoki

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Koita River

[edit]

There seems to be no proper reference to the usage of a term "Koita River". While the Swedish company Vattenfall on its website uniquely uses the term "Lower-Koita River", this clearly (a) is not the same term and not a valid reference "Koita River", (b) refers to another concept (the lower part of Koitajoki), (c) in itself seems to be bad English (to me, by the hyphenation), indicating it does not represent a relevant authority of English language. Koitajoki is the term in English text produced by those knowledgeable of Finnish geography (which I believe Vattenfall is not, but this is prejudice). Sorry about arguing of these again. --Martenz (talk) 22:06, 10 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The English language has many intricacies, just as Finnish does. WP:HYPHEN provides an overview of [many] ways in which hyphens are used within English. For the given example of "Lower-Koita River", the hyphen serves to separate the adjective from the name, in order to prevent ambiguity: "(Lower Koita) (River)" verses "(Lower)-(Koita River)"; English tends to avoid making up compounds. —Sladen (talk) 22:57, 10 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: not done  Skomorokh  17:47, 6 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]



KoitajokiKoita RiverWP:ENGLISH. Similar case to discussion surrounding the move of Kollasjoki to Kollaa River. Page was moved from english name, without discussion, in December 09. - Relisting  Ronhjones  (Talk) 20:49, 29 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Labattblueboy (talk) 06:22, 20 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose - Koitajoki seems well enough used in English. I'd need decent evidence that "Koita River" is more commonly used. Knepflerle (talk) 04:12, 21 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.