Talk:Kolangal (TV series)
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
External links modified[edit]
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Kolangal (TV series). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20141007220928/http://www.suntvnetwork.in/tv-channel-details.aspx?Channelid=1&channelname=SUN%20TV&LanguageID=1&Type=q to http://www.suntvnetwork.in/tv-channel-details.aspx?Channelid=1&channelname=SUN%20TV&LanguageID=1&Type=q
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:15, 12 December 2017 (UTC)
Award fluff[edit]
@Ratheef Ahammed Refuon: With regard to your huffing and puffing in the edit summaries related to this resubmission of awards, Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information. Further, there are probably ten award mills for every resident of India and we are not here to log every one, as they largely exist as a promotional marketing tool. As with most lists of notable people or notable businesses or notable anything, the criteria for inclusion has traditionally required that an article for the entry should exist, where notability has been adequately demonstrated beforehand. This is similarly stated at WP:FILMCRITICLIST, which even specifically mentions award mills as being a source of vexation. Notability is also not inherited, so just because a notable organisation issues an award doesn't mean that the award is notable. Star Parivaar Awards, for instance, are issued by a notable entity, but the awards are meaningless, since they exist only to lavish praise on their own shows and employees. An award being televised doesn't mean that the award is notable or meaningful. A newspaper might be notable, but that doesn't mean the awards are notable.
And the mere fact that the press sends photographers out to document the lavishness doesn't mean that the award is notable either. The press needs to sell newspapers and get readers to click on stuff. They always work hand-in-hand with PR departments and it doesn't cost them much to send a photographer or entertainment reporter to do the red carpet nonsense. Not swaying. So if you want to include these other awards, you'll need to argue for their notability, and no, ref bombing the article obnoxiously doesn't hold much water either. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 13:19, 16 January 2021 (UTC)