This disambiguation page is within the scope of WikiProject Disambiguation, an attempt to structure and organize all disambiguation pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, you can edit the page attached to this talk page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project or contribute to the discussion.DisambiguationWikipedia:WikiProject DisambiguationTemplate:WikiProject DisambiguationDisambiguation articles
This disambiguation page is within the scope of WikiProject National Register of Historic Places, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of U.S. historic sites listed on the National Register of Historic Places on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.National Register of Historic PlacesWikipedia:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesTemplate:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesNational Register of Historic Places articles
The existence of this dab page was disputed by another editor, expressed by his redirecting the article. Since there are clearly multiple wikipedia-notable Koontz Houses, the removal of the dab page was incorrect. It also is incorrect by Wikipedia procedure to unilaterally delete an article by redirecting it when you know the removal of the article is disputed. The proper procedure is to have an AFD. I am restoring it now. If someone wishes to dispute it please do open a proper AFD. However, you know that the AFD will fail. --doncram 14:55, 18 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
At the time of the redirect there was only one article that could be titled Koontz House. You have just now created two more, so a dab page is now appropriate. Station1 (talk) 19:14, 18 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Your redirecting was unilateral, undiscussed, and wrong IMO, as you know, given that you know that there are multiple wikipedia-notable topics of the name. We've been through this before. I know you know I know that you think such dab pages shouldn't exist, etc. Your and my disagreement is not important, can be made moot by creating some of the articles. In the future, if you are not willing to create some of the articles to satisfy your wish for there to be articles, please let me know and I will create them. Okay? Or, open an AFD, which will conclude in the same way (as Keep, with creation of some of the articles to end the discussion). --doncram 21:02, 21 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
