Talk:Kopexil

Pharmacology Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pharmacology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Pharmacology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PharmacologyWikipedia:WikiProject PharmacologyTemplate:WikiProject Pharmacologypharmacology articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Chemicals Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Chemicals, a daughter project of WikiProject Chemistry, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of chemicals. To participate, help improve this article or visit the project page for details on the project.ChemicalsWikipedia:WikiProject ChemicalsTemplate:WikiProject Chemicalschemicals articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

A member of the Guild of Copy Editors reviewed a version of this article for copy editing. However, a major copy edit was inappropriate at that time because of the issues specified below, or the other tags now found on this article. Once these issues have been addressed, and any related tags have been cleared, please tag the article once again for {{copyedit}}. The Guild welcomes all editors with a good grasp of English. Visit our project page if you are interested in joining!

Name[edit]

Aminexil is a registered trade mark. What about moving the article to Kopexil (INN)? --Leyo 16:25, 28 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

See de:Kopexil (in German wiki already done). Rgds --Cvf-ps (talk) 18:39, 28 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Sounds like a good idea to me. L'Oreal wants every mention (sent into OTRS) of Aminexil with an (R) - much better to use the generic name - I didn't add the (R) to the page name as I thought it would make finding it not so easy. Ronhjones ^(Talk) 20:50, 29 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I also suggest we rename File:Aminexil tautomerism.svg as well. Ronhjones ^(Talk) 20:52, 29 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Done. I also added a few categories. --Leyo 09:40, 31 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I've dropped a note on the Polish Wiki as well (pl:Dyskusja_Wikiprojektu:Chemia) - hope Google Translate was up to the job! Ronhjones ^(Talk) 22:20, 2 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Peer reviewed[edit]

Why can't I find this chemical in all of Pubmed? Do you have a peer reviewed source about this medication? It is important to maintain verifiability. Ramwithaxe talk 06:13, 21 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Kopexil. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150722111324/http://www.kumarorganic.net/files/Kopexil-MSDS.pdf to http://www.kumarorganic.net/files/Kopexil-MSDS.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:31, 12 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]