Talk:Kreuzberg Pass
Appearance
![]() | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | This article contains a translation of Kreuzbergpass from de.wikipedia. |
Naming Convention
[edit]As per naming convention:
therefore in line with naming convention: page move required. --noclador (talk) 22:27, 9 February 2009 (UTC)
Requested move 4 May 2016
[edit]- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: Moved. Consensus seems to be in support. (non-admin closure). Anarchyte (work | talk) 09:30, 24 May 2016 (UTC)
Kreuzbergpass → Kreuzberg Pass – Most common English name (c.f. the above, it is five times more common than Kreuzbergpass), follows the normal pass-naming convention and avoids favouring the German over the Italian version of the name. Bermicourt (talk) 20:26, 4 May 2016 (UTC)
- Support this move 2601:541:4305:C70:4449:93DD:9396:8E7A (talk) 17:57, 11 May 2016 (UTC)
- Move to Kreuzberg pass. Not a proper name, so lower (sentence) case per WP:TITLEFORMAT. — Amakuru (talk) 09:26, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
- Support. Clearly more common than the current title. It also looks like "Pass" is generally capitalized in sources.[1]--Cúchullain t/c 16:24, 13 May 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.