This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Germany, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Germany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GermanyWikipedia:WikiProject GermanyTemplate:WikiProject GermanyGermany articles
This redirect is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles
The contents of the Krupp 13.5 cm FK 1909 page were merged into 13.5 cm K 09 on 5 November 2016 and it now redirects there. For the contribution history and old versions of the merged article please see its history.
@WP:MILHIST coordinators: This appears to be the same gun as 13.5 cm K 09 (same caliber, maker, year of introduction, etc). I'm not sure that there's any information on this page that's missing from the other, but perhaps somebody who knows more about WWI should double check and merge anything relevant then make this a redirect? Or, perhaps, merge the other one in to this and make it a redirect instead (I'm not sure which name is more appropriate). --BlckKnght (talk) 04:58, 18 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
There seem to be some odd inconsistencies between the two articles; while most of the data is the same, the 13.5 cm K 09 article shows a longer barrel length and greater shell weight. Perhaps someone with a copy of Twentieth-Century Artillery can confirm whether these are simply errors in one of the articles, or if we're actually dealing with two variants of the gun here? Kirill[talk] 07:29, 18 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
G'day, it looks like this was previously mentioned on the talk page of the other article: [1]. Not sure about the inconsistencies, though. Regards, AustralianRupert (talk) 07:34, 18 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
