Talk:Kuperjanov's Partisan Battalion

Military history: Baltic states / European

This redirect is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

Associated task forces:
/
	Baltic states military history task force
	European military history task force

Estonia

Kuperjanov's Partisan Battalion is part of WikiProject Estonia, a project to maintain and expand Estonia-related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.EstoniaWikipedia:WikiProject EstoniaTemplate:WikiProject EstoniaEstonia articles

To-do list:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : WikiProject Estonia/Missing articles
Assess : Rate each tagged article by quality and importance to the WikiProject if it has not been done. (See Category:Unassessed Estonia articles)
Infobox : Add infoboxes to articles without it
Maintain : Portal:Estonia
Photo : Upload and/or add a photo to articles without it (See Category:Wikipedia requested photographs in Estonia)
Stubs : Add info to stub-articles and check for start-class.

WikiProject Military history/Assessment/Tag & Assess 2008[edit]

Article reassessed and graded as start class. Needs and info box. --dashiellx (talk) 14:08, 10 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Merge[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.

To merge Kuperjanov's Partisan Battalion into Kuperjanov Infantry Battalion Klbrain (talk) 22:36, 24 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I suggest to merge these overlapping articles to Kuperjanov Battalion as the most recognisable name for this unit. --Jaan Pärn (talk) 13:22, 7 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Agree with the merge, on the grounds that it is the same entity. Klbrain (talk) 22:36, 24 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.