Talk:LACM 149371
Appearance
![]() | LACM 149371 has been listed as one of the Natural sciences good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | ||||||||||||
![]() | LACM 149371 is part of the Ferugliotheriidae series, a good topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so. | ||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
![]() | A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on August 7, 2010. The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that the fossil mammalian tooth LACM 149371 shows resemblances with some ungulates, rodents, and multituberculates, but most likely belongs to the extinct Gondwanatheria? | ||||||||||||
Current status: Good article |
![]() | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | It is requested that an image or photograph of LACM 149371 be included in this article to improve its quality. Please replace this template with a more specific media request template where possible.
The Free Image Search Tool or Openverse Creative Commons Search may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites. |
GA Review
[edit]- This review is transcluded from Talk:LACM 149371/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Sasata (talk) 18:46, 14 September 2010 (UTC)
I'll take this one. Comments in a couple of days. Sasata (talk) 18:46, 14 September 2010 (UTC)
- Thanks. This will be the last isolated tooth for a while. Ucucha 19:28, 14 September 2010 (UTC)
Not much to say here, the article reads well.
- date ranges for geological times in the lead
- Done.
- might want to mention in the lead that the tooth's size is only millimetres
- Done.
- enamel prism?
- Explained.
- anything useful in this?
- Much on rodents; nothing on this thing. He doesn't even cite Goin et al. (2004).
Sasata (talk) 02:56, 16 September 2010 (UTC)
- Thanks for the review. Ucucha 03:06, 16 September 2010 (UTC)
- Meets GA criteria, passing now. Sasata (talk) 03:22, 16 September 2010 (UTC)
Categories:
- Wikipedia good articles
- Natural sciences good articles
- GA-Class Featured topics articles
- Wikipedia featured topics Ferugliotheriidae good content
- Low-importance Featured topics articles
- Wikipedia Did you know articles that are good articles
- GA-Class mammal articles
- Low-importance mammal articles
- WikiProject Mammals articles
- GA-Class Palaeontology articles
- Low-importance Palaeontology articles
- GA-Class Palaeontology articles of Low-importance
- WikiProject Palaeontology articles
- Wikipedia requested images of mammals