Talk:LGBT rights in Hungary

This article is of interest to WikiProject LGBT studies, which tries to ensure comprehensive and factual coverage of all LGBT-related issues on Wikipedia. For more information, or to get involved, please visit the project page or contribute to the discussion.LGBT studiesWikipedia:WikiProject LGBT studiesTemplate:WikiProject LGBT studiesLGBT articles

Human rights Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Human rights, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Human rights on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Human rightsWikipedia:WikiProject Human rightsTemplate:WikiProject Human rightsHuman rights articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Hungary Low‑importance

	Hungary portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Hungary, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Hungary on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HungaryWikipedia:WikiProject HungaryTemplate:WikiProject HungaryHungary articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Politics Low‑importance

	Politics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Contradiciton[edit]

Now, the article claims that an impressive 60 % of Hungarians back same sex unions, which would mean that the degree of social progress is downright Western European. In the next paragraph, though, the alleged percentage of acceptance is only 18 % and that seems to be more in accordance with the rest of Eastern Europe's attitude towards gays. Can someone clarify that? Teodorico 06:43, 28 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It's definitely not 60%. 18% seems far more likely, but even that's slightly far-fetched.- User: Honved2018 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Honved2018 (talk • contribs) 17:07, 29 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Questionable accuracy[edit]

According to this article, Hungary is very gay-friendly. In my experience listening to conversations in the country, it's quite the opposite. On the topic of homosexuality, same-sex adoption, and same-sex marriage, I've only heard strongly negative reactions from Hungarians. Homosexuality is described as "immoral," "outrageous," and "an idiocy." I have no idea where the statement "Hungary is one of the most liberal European societies" comes from, because homophobia appears to be rampant among the general public. This fact is sorely lacking in the article. Hungary cannot be compared to nations like Germany and France, where public opinion polls show a far higher acceptance rate of homosexuality in daily society. — Emiellaiendiay 07:11, 31 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I completely agree. Info needs to be qualified.--Tdombos (talk) 00:12, 22 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I agree also. We Hungarians don't exactly support LGBT in Hungary.-User: Honved2018

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on LGBT rights in Hungary. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080315091017/http://www.angus-reid.com/polls/view/14203 to http://www.angus-reid.com/polls/view/14203

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:04, 9 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Homosexuality propaganda law: POV and dubious sources[edit]

Someone is citing the Pink News and it is claiming the law in Hungary is similar to Russia, which is certainly not and that it might be sanctioned by EU, which is also very doubtful. Is it allowed to use Pink News with such a dubious claims as source or must it be supported by mainstream media? --Cautious (talk) 19:30, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Contradictions in summary[edit]

"LGBT people in Hungary may face legal and social challenges not experienced by non-LGBT residents. Homosexuality is legal in Hungary for both men and women. Discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation and sex registered at birth is banned in the country. However, households headed by same-sex couples are not eligible for all of the same legal rights available to heterosexual married couples. Registered partnership for same-sex couples was legalized in 2009, but same-sex marriage remains banned. The Hungarian government has passed legislation that restricts the civil rights of LGBT Hungarians – such as ending legal recognition of transgender Hungarians and banning LGBT content and displays for minors.|"

There are registered partnerships, everything is legal. Where exactly are the legal challenges, the first sentence is talking about??? --Cautious (talk) 07:30, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You should improve your reading with comprehension ability. tgeorgescu (talk) 21:30, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your POV point is that everything is correct and others have a problem. Any merit point from your side, except threats?--Cautious (talk) 07:51, 23 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Informations[edit]

That is not illegal to adopt as single LGBT person, but single persons can adopt only with special government approval, what is irl given in all cases, but to get your papers into the ministry, they have to also signed by lower level authorites, there may make you fail, but pro forma no discrimination allowed on sexual orientation. Gay couples are not allowed to adopt together, or any non-married couples. Single adoption has lower priority compared to married, so single people in most cases only get disabled, older, or Roma children, whom couples are not so passionate about. :( 2020 constitution change was not very explicit ban, rather bullshit slogans about traditional family. Now we can see how it is applied. Also, there is no laws banning openly gay people from serving in military. However, during the universal conscription time, there was a don't ask don't say policy, if you told them you are gay, they not conscripted you. Actually heterosexual people lied about their orientation to avoid conscription, so they sent people to psychiatry test are they really homosexual. Now they officially don't expel you if you came out, that is officially discrimination, and they don't ask, because it is protected personal data. In a nutshell, it's not said explicitly, you can serve if you are openly gay, but there is no law banning it. For trans, army is a no go zone, I think (not sure it is banned by law, but can't imagine that in our quite conservative society.) but that is not a topic at all, maybe there was no precedent yet. I am Hungarian. Non-Hungarian sources are sometimes claiming the situation a bit worse for LGBTQ then it is in reality. Worldwide comparsion we are absolutely pro-gay by laws irl, and even in few European countries there are more harsh laws. The problem is the hard rethoric used by some officials, politicians and propagandists, also homophobia among less educated, rural, older people, these problems are related, because populist politicians say what people want to hear. Also problematic the low quality of rule of law, (probably purposedly) too universal or weirdly specific laws, what is hard to interpret. Some LGBT content is censored (it is poorly defined what is and what is not, and there is a court decision what implies that some parts of the law can't be applied, because they forgot to write a comma somewhere in the law), but irl it means banned from schools, area within 200m around schools and churches, and should be 18+ rated, if printed material, covered by dark foil in the stores, on television it's only allowed to brodcast nighttime. While it is online, like most LGBT content, you just have to click you are over 18. Call by your name is ofc restricted, while the LGBT related episodes of Friends sitcom can run 12+ rated. Sources (use translator programme to check, in Hungarian): https://orokbe.hu/2023/01/18/orokbefogadas-egyedul-2023-ban/ (about single adoption issues) https://index.hu/belfold/2011/02/08/army_of_lovers/2/ (about LGBT in army) https://444.hu/2020/12/15/az-anya-no-az-apa-ferfi-a-fidesz-kdnp-megszavazta-a-9-alkotmanymodositast (constitutional changes) Páfrány (talk) 20:44, 3 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]