Talk:LLC (disambiguation)

Untitled

AFAIK, 90% of the time when somebody says "LLC" they are referring to a Limited Liability Company. 69.17.67.11 14:29, 7 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 12 January 2017

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: move and retarget. (non-admin closure) JudgeRM (talk to me) 03:02, 19 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

LLC → LLC (disambiguation) – Move to retarget to Limited liability company. I have been disambiguating this title for over five years, and I have never seen a link to "LLC" intending any meaning other than "Limited Liability Company". Looking to the articles listed on the disambiguation page itself, three of these (LCM-1E, Small Planet Airlines, and CPU cache) are not called "LLC" at all except in variations of minor notability; "Laurentian Leadership Centre" and "Lend Lease Corporation" are redirects to Trinity Western University and Lend Lease Group, respectively, and Landlocked country doesn't even contain "LLC" in the article. For the three remaining titles, which are the only genuine title matches for "LLC", Literary and Linguistic Computing has averaged two pageviews per day over the last 90 days, Lunar Lander Challenge has averaged 24 pageviews per day over the last 90 days, and Limited Liability Company has averaged 2,787 views per day, adding up to over a quarter million in the last 90 days, so probably over a million views a year. A Google search of "LLC" yields pages and pages of information about forming and operating limited liability companies, and entities that are in fact limited liability companies. I went twenty pages deep without seeing anything else. I think we have a clear primary topic here. bd2412 T 02:12, 12 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Support – best primarytopic rationale I've seen in that much time, too. Dicklyon (talk) 03:04, 12 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Support a real primary topic. In ictu oculi (talk) 08:57, 12 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Support seems to be crystal clear. Sir Joseph ^(talk) 18:30, 12 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Support When in ictu oculi says it is a primary topic, it must be. Timmyshin (talk) 04:59, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.