Talk:LMS Ivatt Class 2 2-6-2T
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Photograph
[edit]09/07/07 - Added a new photo for the "41241 from the rear, showing the shape of the bunker" caption, as it was appearing as a red link, suggesting the previous photo had been removed. This new photo is one I took this afternoon. -GBev1987.
- The photo at Low Moor is not of a 2-6-2T but seems to show Fairburn 2-6-4T No. 42141.8474tim (talk) 18:59, 4 October 2010 (UTC)
- Agreed; the tanks (and their rivet head pattern), cab, bunker and wheels are wrong for Ivatt 2-6-2T; it does look more like Fairburn 2-6-4T; and the partial number is "144" (poss 141) which suggests that there has been a digit transposition (42144 not 41244; I guess it could be 42141). Will transfer the image to the Fairburn 2-6-4T page. --Redrose64 (talk) 20:13, 4 October 2010 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on LMS Ivatt Class 2 2-6-2T. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110114225919/http://picasaweb.google.com/clogandknocker/OldStaffordToUttoxeterRailwayLine to http://picasaweb.google.com/clogandknocker/OldStaffordToUttoxeterRailwayLine
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:21, 9 May 2017 (UTC)