Talk:La Grange Historic District (North Carolina)
Appearance
La Grange Historic District (North Carolina) has been listed as one of the Geography and places good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: May 18, 2024. (Reviewed version). |
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the La Grange Historic District (North Carolina) article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:La Grange Historic District (North Carolina)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Nominator: APK (talk · contribs) 09:36, 19 February 2024 (UTC)
Reviewer: 48JCL (talk · contribs) 00:48, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
Hello! I am excited to review this article.
It is reasonably well written.
- a (prose, spelling, and grammar):
- b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (reference section): I’m sorry, but the CN tag is an issue for a GAN.
- Fixed. APK hi :-) (talk) 05:22, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
- Great! That’s a pass. 48JCL (talk • contribs) 16:57, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
- b (citations to reliable sources): sources are reliable! Gov websites are working.
- c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism): This was so tedious to do but thats a pass
It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects): Contains major aspects.
- b (focused): doesn’t really focus on minor aspects. So pass!
It follows the neutral point of view policy. Nice job! This article strives for the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.: Pretty easy pass. Very few authors.
It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): Yep, images are tagged, that’s a pass
- b (appropriate use with suitable captions): Captions are fine, however, when you say, 130 South Caswell Stret is one of many commercial buildings in need of repair, do you mean street?
Recommend alt text. @APK
Overall: Pass/Fail:
Source Check
[edit]Forgot to add this! Pretty short article, took like 30 minutes. Passing!
Final comments
[edit]PASSING! But please add alt text lol @APK
- Thank you very much. APK hi :-) (talk) 03:48, 20 May 2024 (UTC)
Categories:
- Wikipedia good articles
- Geography and places good articles
- GA-Class National Register of Historic Places articles
- Low-importance National Register of Historic Places articles
- GA-Class National Register of Historic Places articles of Low-importance
- GA-Class United States articles
- Low-importance United States articles
- GA-Class United States articles of Low-importance
- GA-Class North Carolina articles
- Low-importance North Carolina articles
- WikiProject North Carolina articles
- WikiProject United States articles