Talk:La Manada rape case

Law Low‑importance

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Spain Mid‑importance

	Spain portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Spain, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Spain on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SpainWikipedia:WikiProject SpainTemplate:WikiProject SpainSpain articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Sexology and sexuality Low‑importance

	Human sexuality portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sexology and sexuality, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of human sexuality on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Sexology and sexualityWikipedia:WikiProject Sexology and sexualityTemplate:WikiProject Sexology and sexualitySexology and sexuality articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

What Hollywood thinks of the case is irrelevant.

The last sentence at the end of the "Reactions" section is spurious and should be deleted. "American actresses Jessica Chastain and Rose McGowan expressed condemnation of the sentence.[17]"

Jessica Chastain and Rose McGowan are not legal experts, much less experts on Spanish law. Condemnation by specific prominent Spaniard might (but probably not) be relevant, but certainly not by minor public figures 6,000 miles away. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Evx (talk • contribs) 20:50, 25 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Somebody keeps removing the rapist's names from this article. I suggest the article be locked from whoever is doing this. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 59.100.224.222 (talk) 23:29, 15 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]