Talk:Labour Against the Witchhunt

	This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC articles
	This article was accepted from this draft on 28 May 2019 by reviewer MartinPoulter (talk · contribs).

Politics of the United Kingdom

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics of the United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Politics of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Politics of the United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomPolitics of the United Kingdom articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Short description[edit]

I originally added the short description as "British Labour Party political campaign", however this was reverted by a user for the reason of the campaign being mainly lead by non/ex members. Any suggestions as to what it should be?PoliceSheep99 (talk) 10:53, 3 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

How about:Campaign for fair UK Labour Party discipline Jontel (talk) 11:15, 3 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Purpose of the group[edit]

Surely the best source for what the group's stated purpose is is what the group says it is. How can hostile third party interpretations using either anonymous quotes or broad interviews be superior sources? Jontel (talk) 10:38, 5 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

When "hostile third party interpretations" = "reliable sources", they are superior. 11Fox11 (talk) 02:53, 7 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]