Talk:Lady Washington

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Image[edit]

The photo says it was taken in 1988, but the replica Lady Washington wasn't built until 1989. Huh? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Justi521 (talkcontribs) 18:01, 9 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sources I've been able to find say she was built "in time for the 1989 centennial." It's possible she was launched in 1988. -- Brianhe (talk) 22:28, 20 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
All the photos currently in use are from 2008 - one by User:Miso Beno from July 2008 from shore looking at her, and the gallery I took in November 2008 from aboard the ship. Georgewilliamherbert (talk) 08:05, 21 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Split this article?[edit]

This deals with two ships, one historical and one a modern replica. It would make sense to treat them as two separate articles. -- Brianhe (talk) 22:27, 20 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The historical ship isn't really notable enough by herself - she's primarily notable for having spawned a modern replica, which is notable for three reasons - not very many actively sailing tall ships today, so they're all notable; she's appeared in several movies / TV series; she's one of the very few tall ships which routinely does at-sea sail experiences for the general public.
Georgewilliamherbert (talk) 08:05, 21 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
A lot of the inlinks to this article come from Template:Oregon Early History which does't seem to care about the replica ship. If it remains one article, maybe it would be good to have clear sub-sections to indicate which ship is discussed. - Brianhe (talk) 15:42, 21 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Better late then never. I just splitted the article in the german wp: de:Lady Washington (Schiff, 1989) and de:Lady Washington (Schiff, 1780). The replica as a National symbol is relevant by this, the original because it has been the first ship documented passing Cape Hoorn. --CeGe (talk) 12:05, 27 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Pasco Union Pacific Railroad Bridge Event?[edit]

The Lady had a run-in with the Union Pacific Bridge in Pasco in the 90s that broke a mast or two. There's a song and some articles that I'm unable to locate. Such information would be relevant to the current Lady Washington. 130.20.71.48 (talk) 17:08, 26 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

https://archive.seattletimes.com/archive/?date=19911018&slug=1311762 Wcroth55 (talk) 16:15, 2 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]


"Brig" vs "Brig" vs "Brigantine" vs "Brigantine" vs "Snow"[edit]

There's enormous confusion all over the web (including Wikipedia) regarding the difference between a brig, a brigantine, and a snow. The root of this confusion is that, like the words "chips" and "pants", the terms "brig" and "brigantine" mean different things depending on if you're using US or UK terminology. A brig(US) could be the same thing as a brigantine(UK), and a brigantine(US) is a hermaphrodite-brig(UK). Further complicating matters is that many people lump the snow in with the brig due to similar appearance. I've added a short clarification paragraph to help people understand what the Lady Washington actually is. See the brig, brigantine, and sail plan pages for more info. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.74.34.8 (talk) 18:43, 29 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Lady Washington. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:43, 2 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]