Jump to content

Talk:Lah number

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Notation

[edit]

Is the proposed notation

standard? Or do authors generally content themselves with ?
Bender05 06:59, 28 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Relation with Stirling numbers

[edit]

The article states the Lah-numbers are related to the Stirling numbers but does not give precise relations. To fill the gap I added such a relation in the Identities and relations section. —Preceding unsigned comment added by TheoricienQuantique (talkcontribs) 13:31, 20 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Combinatorial interpretation

[edit]

In the combinatorial interpretation, the description "in such a way that all elements of the same subset are linearly ordered" doesn't seem to match, say, L(3,1) including {(132)}, which appears not to be "linearly ordered". Perhaps the description can be reworded? Robertd (talk) 15:35, 27 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]