Talk:Lake Abita

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Discrepancy[edit]

The opening says that the lake is Minnesota's ninth highest. The Topography section says that it is the highest.

The page was written using sources which may or may not have been outdated by further surveys. The original survey of the greater Misquah Hills region erred significantly in assigning the state's land high point, so I had begun developing a suspicion about whether that could be an issue with the measure of the highest lake as well. I'd very much like to see the actual data used to assign Abita position 9, but the present source appears to link merely to the metadata, not the actual survey data. Norstrem (talk) 00:49, 8 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Lake Abita. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:38, 15 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]