Talk:Lambda Velorum
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
.jpg){kind=small}
Yellow star example[edit]
I've only seen Lambda Velorum once, but it really looked yellow to me. The most vivid shade of yellow of any star I've ever seen. Is this worth mentioning in the article? After all, red stars have a real following, so why not highlight an outstanding example of a yellow star? LightSpeed (talk) 00:53, 31 August 2009 (UTC)
- That's curious because K-type stars are usually described as orange. Were there any contrasting stars in the view? That can sometimes have an effect on the perceived hue. Regards, RJH (talk) 18:26, 17 February 2012 (UTC)
External links modified[edit]
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Lambda Velorum. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive http://www.webcitation.org/6630AbtJZ?url=http://outreach.atnf.csiro.au/education/senior/astrophysics/photometry_colour.html to http://outreach.atnf.csiro.au/education/senior/astrophysics/photometry_colour.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:29, 11 May 2017 (UTC)