Talk:Lannion–Côte de Granit Airport

	France portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject France, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of France on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FranceWikipedia:WikiProject FranceTemplate:WikiProject FranceFrance articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Aviation: Airports

	Aviation portal This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation articles
	This article is supported by the airport project.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Lannion – Côte de Granit Airport. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071011120026/http://www.aeroport.fr/les-aeroports-de-l-uaf/lannion-cote-de-granit.php to http://www.aeroport.fr/les-aeroports-de-l-uaf/lannion-cote-de-granit.php

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:38, 16 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Merge with Lannion Airfield

Lannion Airfield should be merged into this article as its History section. Same airfield/airport. -- P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:10, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support per nom. Also I have notified WP:WikiProject Airports. ASUKITE 21:23, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Disagree This will make the article on the modern airport far too heavily focused on deep details from World War 2, with almost no info post-1945. Pmbma (talk) 21:50, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not a reason not to merge, but a reason to add post-1945 info! -- P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:09, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support per nom. Not worthy to have two separate article on the same airport, the current airport article is tiny; less than 3,000 bytes, ripe for expansion. Gavbadger (talk) 17:08, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support these are the same airport, a lack of info on the modern airport is not a reason not to merge. SportingFlyer T·C 17:43, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disagree Added 5,300 bytes of post-war history on the modern airport. Specific Luftwaffe history should stay here.

Bollardant (talk) 01:12, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disagree This article is very detailed on the Luftwaffe usage, and should stay as a seperate article. There is also history on the other page.

KeyMen12 (talk) 08:19, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support per nom, neither article is particularly long or unwieldy, and the merged article shouldn't be either; the resultant History section won't be any longer than that of Dallas Fort Worth International Airport (citing a page I've edited frequently). I strongly concur with SportingFlyer that the relative lack of postwar history is no reason not to merge. Carguychris (talk) 13:49, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]