Talk:Lantern Theater Company

Philadelphia Mid‑importance

	Philadelphia portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philadelphia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Philadelphia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhiladelphiaWikipedia:WikiProject PhiladelphiaTemplate:WikiProject PhiladelphiaPhiladelphia articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Theatre Low‑importance

	Theatre portal This article is part of WikiProject Theatre, a WikiProject dedicated to coverage of theatre on Wikipedia. To participate: Feel free to edit the article attached to this page, join up at the project page, or contribute to the project discussion.TheatreWikipedia:WikiProject TheatreTemplate:WikiProject TheatreTheatre articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Theater

Whoever it is that keeps using the british spelling "theatre", please stop it. Nothing against British spellings, but this is an American theater company and the other american theater articles use the american spelling. Also, the wiki-links keep redirecting incorretly otherwise. Thanks. Prophet121 21:18, 28 April 2008 (UTC)

Many American theater companies use the "-re" spelling as a matter of tradition, so it's not strictly a US vs. UK WP:ENGVAR question. The actual name used by the company should be respected, "theater" should almost always be used in regard to American movie houses, and "theatre" or "theater" can be used in regard to "legitimate" houses depending on circumstances. In New York, Philadelphia, Boston and other older East Coast cities, for instance, the vast majority of theatrical companies and stages use the "-re" spelling, so it would not be out of line to talk about "theatres in Boston" - but "theaters in Boston" would do as well. As one moves West, there's less and less use of "-re", so the normal American spelling would be most appropriate.

In the case of the Latern Theater Company, the organization uses "-er", so that's what this article uses. BMK (talk) 04:32, 26 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Controversy

Apparently Latern came into criticism for their staging of Julius Caesar in yellowface, and information about the controversy was appropriately added to the article. However, people connected with the critics have continued to attempt to add even more material to the paragraph about the controversy, and I have been reverting those efforts.

My feeling is that one third of the lede section is a sufficient amount to state what the controversy was, and per WP:WEIGHT, more would unbalance the article. Further, much of the material was promotional in nature, violating WP:PROMO and WP:SOAPBOX. Simply being verifiable and supporting information with a reliable source is not sufficient if it causes the article to be too one-sided. We most adhere to the neutral point of view. BMK (talk) 04:38, 26 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Lantern Theater Company. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:38, 17 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]