Talk:Lanthanum carbide

lanthanum carbide ina bucky jar

The wellesley college reference [1] is incorrect- the web site just says bucky jar with lanthanum carbide in it discovered 1993. I can't fins a ref to this only similar papers --Axiosaurus (talk) 15:48, 29 March 2008 (UTC)

I have come back to this article- it is very confused. Firstly the carbide LaC₂ with C₂ units which can be written as La^IIIC₂ (e-) where an electron enters the conduction band which is probably close to the anti-bonding pi orbital on the C₂^2- ion. Secondly there is the La@C₇₂ "compound" - basically an La atom in a fullerene cage. It looks like accounts of both materials have been mixed up and some possible errors in transcribing the experimental data made. I will come back to this soon - when real life permitsAxiosaurus (talk) 16:26, 26 November 2013 (UTC)

Tidied it up- restructured and added a little new material Axiosaurus (talk) 17:30, 4 December 2013 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Lanthanum carbide. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060903161925/http://www.wellesley.edu/Chemistry/Flick/bucky/partfive1.html to http://www.wellesley.edu/Chemistry/Flick/bucky/partfive1.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:41, 17 December 2017 (UTC)