Talk:Laser capture microdissection

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Molecular Biology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Molecular Biology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Molecular BiologyWikipedia:WikiProject Molecular BiologyTemplate:WikiProject Molecular BiologyMolecular Biology articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Molecular and Cell Biology task force (assessed as Mid-importance).

Tip: Anchors are case-sensitive in most browsers.

This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.

[[complete blood count#Methods|blood smears]] The anchor (#Methods) has been deleted by other users before.

Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors

Merge[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.

The result was merge into Laser capture microdissection. -- Blue Rasberry 20:53, 24 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Is not Laser microdissection the same as the subject of this page, Laser capture microdissection? If so, the articles should be merged. Can someone say whether there is a distinction between the names? Blue Rasberry 16:21, 11 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,

it's absolutely correct. I support your merger. If you want to talk in general about this topic you should use the term "laser microdissection". "Laser capture microdissection" is an application topic of one of the suppliers of such an instrument. Categories can be: microscopy, lasers, molecular biology, biomedical research, laser scalpel —Preceding unsigned comment added by 93.104.112.55 (talk) 13:40, 12 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I also agree and support this merger. Although "laser microdissection" is the more general term, "laser capture microdissection" or LCM is much more heavily used by members of the life sciences field (and by all suppliers including Zeiss, Leica, Arcturus, etc.). I agree with BlueRaspberry's categories as well. Jockrock14 (talk) 18:04, 24 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, I am taking all content from laser microdissection and moving it here, and also setting up a redirect from that page to this one. Blue Rasberry 21:00, 24 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

External links may be spam[edit]

It is hard to find info about laser microdissection, and the websites selling equipment for this process appear in the external links. These links are WP:SPAM; I just reverted the addition of a zeiss.de sales site three times; it is my opinion that the apparent info on the site is for sales and not giving info on the field of laser microdissection. Blue Rasberry 15:27, 11 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

That might be right, but the other links also have sales information on the link:

LMD Solutions
Leica Microsystems commercial non-contact Laser Microdissection systems

So I ask you to be fair on these terms. Please delete all company links or release all company links.

best regards ... —Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.152.5.244 (talk) 15:42, 11 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Plagarism[edit]

At least the first paragraph of the first section is verified to be directly copied and pasted from the citation given. Someone should at least attempt to integrate the material instead of ripping it directly. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Veghead13 (talk • contribs) 13:23, 23 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on Laser capture microdissection. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 19:39, 14 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on Laser capture microdissection. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 16:33, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Laser capture microdissection. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20121013205553/http://www.ecu.edu/lcm/ to http://www.ecu.edu/lcm/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:33, 2 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]