Talk:Lasioglossum aeneiventre

	Insects portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Insects, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of insects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.InsectsWikipedia:WikiProject InsectsTemplate:WikiProject InsectsInsects articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Hymenoptera task force (assessed as Low-importance).
	An editor has requested that an image or photograph be added to this article.

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Raymundo.marcelo.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 23:56, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Comments

There seems to be conflicting info regarding date of discovery. I see 1916 and 1917. I added a few additonal links. I feel like the male and female sections are thorough but potentially too compllex for the average reader to understand. THey are so much longer than other potentially more important sections. Maybe they could be cut down and simplified? Courtney.cleveland (talk) 00:32, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Suggestions

Overall, I thought this article was straightforward, while still providing a broad look at the L. aeneiventre. One of the biggest improvements that I would recommend would be the addition of images. There is not a picture depicting the appearance of the L. aeneiventre or a world map for readers to understand where the L. aeneiventre is endemic to. I feel that adding this information would make your article more aesthetically appealing and informative, and bring it closer to GA status. In addition, I went ahead and added more links to your article, such as for “ocellus” “terga” and “clypeus”, but will still recommend adding more as this enhances the ease with which users can look up unknown information. Lastly, if possible I would recommend adding more information to the “Diet” and “Parasites” section if possible, as these sections were a little short. Altogether though, I thought this article was great!Mmc7777 (talk) 02:42, 4 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]